Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 8 MIN READ

Form 1099-NEC is coming back, and it fixes a PATH Act mess

The IRS is resurrecting a form it retired in 1983, because the 2015 split-deadline regime has aged badly

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
8 min read Updated
Contents 7 sections
  1. What is actually changing
  2. Why this is happening, in operational terms
  3. The history, briefly, because it is weird
  4. What payers and contractors should expect between now and January 2021
  5. Second-order effects worth watching
  6. Loose end: the 1982 instructions
  7. Sources

he IRS is bringing back Form 1099-NEC for the 2020 tax year. The draft posted on July 24 and the comment window under the Federal Register notice closed at the end of September. If you pay independent contractors, the box you have filled in for a generation is moving off the 1099-MISC and onto its own one-page form.

This is a cleanup, not a policy change. The reporting obligation is the same; the deadline arithmetic that has tangled payroll departments since 2017 is what is getting rewritten.

What is actually changing

For payments made in calendar year 2020, you will file Form 1099-NEC instead of putting nonemployee compensation in Box 7 of Form 1099-MISC. The first filing season is January 2021. The draft Form 1099-NEC is a short document with four money boxes: nonemployee compensation (Box 1), payer-made direct sales of $5,000 or more (Box 2, reserved on the current draft), federal income tax withheld (Box 4), and the state information block (Boxes 5 through 7). It is the same economic footprint as the old Box 7, extracted from a form that had accumulated fifteen other uses.

The 2020 draft Form 1099-MISC, posted August 19, renumbers the remaining boxes and removes Box 7 entirely. Rents, royalties, prizes, medical payments, attorney gross proceeds, and the rest stay where they were, with a tidier box map.

Filing method and recipient copy rules do not change. The 1099-NEC will ride the same electronic filing system (FIRE, moving toward IRIS), the same TIN matching service, and the same backup-withholding mechanics under IRC § 3406. If you withheld 24% on a contractor who refused to give you a W-9, you will report that withholding in Box 4 of the 1099-NEC rather than Box 4 of the 1099-MISC. Otherwise the workflow is identical.

Why this is happening, in operational terms

The story starts with the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, known as PATH. Section 201 of PATH amended Internal Revenue Code § 6071 by inserting a new subsection (c) that accelerated the federal filing deadline for Forms W-2 and for Forms 1099-MISC that report nonemployee compensation in Box 7. Starting with forms filed in 2017, both kinds of return had to be with the IRS or the Social Security Administration by January 31, not the old late-February or March 31 electronic date.

The congressional motive was fraud control. Refund-fraud rings were filing fake returns in February on the strength of real W-2 data and collecting checks before the real employer had submitted its own copies. Synchronizing the wage and nonemployee-compensation deadlines with the taxpayer return season let the IRS match information returns against individual returns before refunds went out.

The operational problem was that PATH accelerated only Box 7 of the 1099-MISC, not the whole form. Rents (Box 1), royalties (Box 2), other income (Box 3), medical payments (Box 6), gross proceeds to an attorney (Box 14), and so on all kept their pre-PATH deadlines: February 28 on paper, March 31 electronically. One form, two deadlines, depending on which box had a dollar figure in it. A 30-day automatic extension was still available for the late-February boxes but was stripped for any 1099-MISC that included Box 7.

This sounds like a paperwork annoyance and was worse than that. The IRS treats every 1099-MISC submitted after January 31 with a Box 7 entry as late, even if the filer correctly segregated nonemployee returns and was submitting a second batch for the rents and royalties. Filers who combined batches and hit the late-February date ate a late-filing penalty on everything. Filers who split batches for the same payee (some contractors are also landlords of office space, for instance) ended up sending two 1099-MISCs for the same payee with different postmarks. Tax-software vendors wrote workarounds; many payroll service bureaus rebuilt their filing engines; the IRS's own systems had to branch on box contents.

Revenue Procedure 2017-58 and subsequent guidance put these split deadlines in black and white, and the IRS's 2018 compliance data showed the predictable consequence: a spike in late-filing notices for Box 7 compensation attached to otherwise timely 1099-MISC submissions.

Separating nonemployee compensation onto its own form is the cleanest way out. Two forms, two deadlines, one form per deadline. The new 1099-NEC is due January 31 to both the IRS and the recipient (with no automatic 30-day extension). The 1099-MISC returns to February 28 (paper) and March 31 (electronic), with the 30-day automatic extension available on Form 8809 restored. That is the whole reform.

The history, briefly, because it is weird

Form 1099-NEC is not a new form. The IRS issued it as a standalone return from the 1970s through the 1982 tax year. In 1983 the Service consolidated a grab-bag of small-payment reporting (rents, royalties, prizes, nonemployee compensation) into a single Form 1099-MISC, in part to reduce the number of information returns the then-paper-based IRS had to sort. The retired 1099-NEC sat dormant in the form inventory for about 37 years.

The 2019 draft is essentially the old form redrawn in current typography, with the state-reporting block updated for combined federal/state filing program participants and with the TIN truncation convention that has become standard on recipient copies. The instructions the IRS posted in draft form reference the same backup withholding, the same $600 reporting threshold under IRC § 6041A for services, and the same payer responsibilities. If you have filed a 1099-MISC with a Box 7 entry at any point in the last decade, you have already filed a 1099-NEC; you just called it something else.

What payers and contractors should expect between now and January 2021

Action items for businesses that issue 1099s: inventory your 2019 vendors and confirm whether each is on a 1099-MISC track, a 1099-NEC track, or both. The "both" category is the one that needs attention. Lawyers are the canonical example. Gross proceeds paid to an attorney go in Box 14 of the 1099-MISC (2020 renumbering: Box 10); attorney fees for services rendered to the payer go on the 1099-NEC. If your trial counsel sends you an invoice that includes the settlement pass-through and the fee in one line item, you will file two forms in 2021, not one, and the deadlines will differ by a month.

Ask your accounting software vendor, in writing, how it plans to split the 1099-MISC ledger classes for tax year 2020. QuickBooks, Xero, Sage, NetSuite, and the major payroll bureaus will all handle it, but the upgrade path differs. If you have custom mappings to Box 7, you will rebuild them against Box 1 of the 1099-NEC. If you have approval workflows that trigger on 1099-MISC totals over a threshold, check that they still fire against the new form.

For contractors and consultants organized as an LLC, the change is mostly invisible. Your client will send you a 1099-NEC in late January 2021 instead of a 1099-MISC. The dollar in Box 1 is the dollar that was in Box 7. It flows to Schedule C or to the partnership or S-corp return the same way it always did. The one cosmetic change: the recipient copy you receive will not have the fifteen boxes of other categories, which tends to reduce the "which number is my number" confusion at tax time. If you are deciding whether to form a single-member LLC or keep running as a sole proprietor, the 1099 reporting mechanics are not the swing factor; the liability shield and the state-level franchise-tax exposure are, and the 1099-NEC does not change either.

For states that conform to federal 1099 deadlines or participate in the Combined Federal/State Filing Program, expect a state-level notice in the fall confirming that the 1099-NEC is accepted through the CF/SF channel and specifying any divergence in state filing deadlines. A few states (California, Oregon, Wisconsin have historically been the watch-list) run their own direct-filing systems with deadlines that track but do not exactly mirror the federal date.

Second-order effects worth watching

Penalties under IRC §§ 6721 and 6722 for late or incorrect information returns apply by return. Splitting Box 7 onto its own form technically increases the number of information returns a business files in a year where it has both rent and contractor payments to the same payee. A business that filed one late 1099-MISC for a payee who appeared in both Box 1 and Box 7 under the old regime paid one penalty; under the new regime a late 1099-NEC and a timely 1099-MISC are two separate compliance events. The penalty exposure per payee-pair increases at the margin. Most filers will not notice; businesses with thousands of vendors and a historically sloppy January 31 process will.

The TCJA's interaction with self-employment reporting does not change, but readers who have been following the QBI rules should note that the IRS is expected to use 1099-NEC totals as one of the inputs to aggregate-level monitoring of the § 199A passthrough deduction. Having nonemployee compensation on its own line makes it easier for the Service to cross-check contractor income against Schedule C gross receipts at scale. This is not new audit authority; it is cleaner data.

The 30-day automatic extension on Form 8809 that vanished for Box 7 payers in 2017 comes back for 1099-MISC filers in 2021. For 1099-NEC filers it does not. If January 31 has been the pressure date for your accounting team, it will continue to be, and the form you are racing will just have a shorter name.

Loose end: the 1982 instructions

If you want an afternoon's curiosity, the National Archives has a run of the 1982 instructions for the original 1099-NEC in its paper-filings collection. The form fields are not quite identical to the 2020 draft, but the language is familiar enough that a payroll clerk from the Reagan administration would have no trouble filing next year's return. Whether that says something about tax law's durability, or about the limits of the IRS's paperwork imagination, is for the reader to decide.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.