Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 7 MIN READ

Holding company structures in September 2017: what actually works

One parent, several operating subs, and a file of intercompany paper that no one wants to write until a creditor asks for it

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
7 min read Updated
Contents 6 sections
  1. The shapes people actually use
  2. Federal tax treatment, briefly but exactly
  3. The anti-abuse rules that bite
  4. Where the liability shield fails
  5. Practical assembly in late 2017
  6. Sources

holding company is a legal wrapper whose only job is to own other legal wrappers. The point is isolation: a lawsuit against the restaurant does not reach the building, and a tax attribute inside one subsidiary does not bleed into another. The structure is cheap to form and expensive to get wrong.

What follows is how the common structures actually assemble in September 2017, which federal tax rules bind them, and the two or three ways operators keep losing the liability shield they paid lawyers to build.

The shapes people actually use

Three patterns cover most of the field.

The first is the Delaware parent with operating subsidiaries. A Delaware LLC or C-corp sits at the top, owns all the equity of each operating entity, and does nothing else. Each operating sub is formed where it does business — a California LLC running a California restaurant, a Texas LLC running a Texas restaurant — and is wholly owned by the parent. The parent itself usually foreign-qualifies only where it actually transacts business as a parent, which is often nowhere. This is the structure venture-backed companies grow into when they expand across state lines, and the structure private-equity sponsors use by default.

The second is one LLC per real-estate property. Each building, or sometimes each parcel, sits in its own single-purpose LLC; the LLCs are all owned by a common parent (or, in smaller portfolios, directly by the same individuals). The goal is unambiguous: a slip-and-fall at 132 Main Street reaches only the LLC that owns 132 Main Street. This is why a five-building landlord pays five sets of annual fees. Lenders on commercial real estate frequently require this structure as a condition of the loan and insist that the borrower be a "bankruptcy-remote" single-purpose entity with independent-manager covenants in its operating agreement.

The third is the brother-sister structure, where the same owners hold two or more operating entities directly, with no parent on top. Brother-sister is common among closely held families and small partnerships because it avoids a layer of formation and reporting. It gives the same horizontal liability separation as a parent-sub stack if the paperwork is done, and it forfeits the federal consolidated return (see below) because there is no 80%-owned common parent in the C-corp case.

Federal tax treatment, briefly but exactly

For C-corporation groups, the consolidated-return rules under IRC §§ 1501–1504 let an affiliated group file a single federal return and net losses across members. "Affiliated group" under § 1504(a) is the 80% test: the common parent must own stock representing at least 80% of the total voting power and at least 80% of the total value of each included subsidiary. Below 80%, no consolidation. See 26 U.S.C. § 1504(a)(2). The election is made on Form 1122 for each first-time consolidating subsidiary, and once made the group generally stays consolidated until the Commissioner grants permission to deconsolidate (Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-75). The upside is real — losses at a startup sub can shelter profits at a mature sub in the same year — but consolidation imports its own apparatus: SRLY rules, unified loss rules, intercompany transaction regulations at Treas. Reg. § 1.1502-13.

For LLC holding structures, there is no consolidated return because pass-through entities don't file one. An LLC parent that owns LLC subs typically collapses, for federal purposes, into a single partnership return (or a single disregarded entity) because a wholly owned LLC is disregarded by default under Treas. Reg. § 301.7701-3. A single-member parent LLC holding several single-member sub LLCs is, federally, one taxpayer reporting on one Schedule C or one Form 1065 depending on parent ownership. The liability separation is preserved at state law; the tax simplicity is preserved at federal law. That combination is why the LLC holding stack became the default for real estate.

The brother-sister pattern's federal treatment depends on what the entities are. Two S-corps owned by the same individuals file two separate 1120-S returns; there is no netting at the federal level. Two disregarded LLCs owned by the same individual collapse onto that individual's 1040.

The anti-abuse rules that bite

Holding structures attract two specific federal doctrines.

Section 269A lets the IRS reallocate income, deductions, credits, and other items among related taxpayers — including members of a controlled group — when a principal purpose of the arrangement is evasion of federal income tax or a clear reflection of the income of any of them. The section is narrower in text than its sibling § 482 but routinely invoked against personal-service corporations set up to shift income from a high-bracket individual into a lower-bracket entity. See 26 U.S.C. § 269A.

The broader tool is § 482, which authorizes the IRS to reallocate income and deductions between any two commonly controlled taxpayers to reflect arm's-length pricing. The regulations (Treas. Reg. § 1.482-1 et seq.) control intercompany services, loans, and licenses. Intercompany loans between a parent and a sub need a note, an interest rate at or above the applicable federal rate, and actual payments — otherwise the IRS treats the "loan" as a contribution to capital or a constructive dividend and recharacterizes the tax consequences. This is not rare. It is the most common transfer-pricing adjustment in closely held holding groups.

Where the liability shield fails

Forming the entities is the easy part. Keeping them is where operators lose.

Delaware courts, whose opinions drive the doctrine most other states follow, pierce the veil when the shareholder or member has so dominated the entity that it has no separate mind, will, or existence of its own, and adherence to the corporate fiction would sanction fraud or injustice. The canonical statement is Wallace ex rel. Cencom Cable Income Partners II, Inc., L.P. v. Wood, 752 A.2d 1175 (Del. Ch. 1999), applied repeatedly since. The factors courts weigh — grossly inadequate capitalization, commingling of funds, failure to observe corporate formalities, siphoning of funds, absence of corporate records — all become harder to satisfy when there are several entities in a stack, because each entity is evaluated separately.

That separateness is the point and the trap. A holding company with five subs must respect five sets of formalities: five bank accounts, five sets of minutes or written consents, five operating agreements, five EINs, five separate books. Intercompany transactions — a loan from parent to sub, a management fee from sub to parent, a lease from one sub to another — must be documented in writing, priced at arm's-length, booked contemporaneously, and actually paid. The file of intercompany paper is the single most common thing holding-company operators skip and the single thing plaintiffs' counsel asks for first in discovery.

Real-estate LLCs fail the same way. A landlord with five single-purpose LLCs who runs them all through one checking account and writes checks from the wrong entity has, in practical effect, one entity that will be consolidated by a court when a tenant falls down the stairs.

Practical assembly in late 2017

For a small operating business expanding into a second line: form a Delaware parent LLC or C-corp, form each operating business as a separate state-native LLC wholly owned by the parent, put each subsidiary's own bank account and tax ID in place before any revenue flows, and paper the intercompany services agreement before the parent starts billing the subs. For real estate: one LLC per property, each with its own bank account and its own insurance, and a written management agreement with whichever entity is actually running operations.

For a C-corp group planning to consolidate: make sure the parent clears 80% of vote and value in every sub you want inside the group, file Form 1122 for first-year subs, and budget for a tax adviser who knows § 1.1502-13 — the intercompany-transaction regulations are genuinely hard and the adjustments hit in the year before anyone expects them.

The right holding structure is boring to administer and boring to read in an indictment. If yours is either interesting or convenient, one of those is pulling against the point of having it.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.