Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 8 MIN READ

How to choose a state when you don't live there

The case for forming where you operate, and the shrinking list of reasons to charter somewhere else in 2024

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
8 min read Updated
Contents 6 sections
  1. The question, and the shape of the answer
  2. Why the operating state always wins
  3. The Wyoming privacy pitch, post-CTA
  4. When the second state actually earns its keep
  5. The rule, stated cleanly
  6. Sources

orm in the state where you operate. That rule has held for a decade and it holds harder now, because the two old reasons to shop around, tax arbitrage and member privacy, both got narrower in the last eighteen months.

The Corporate Transparency Act took effect January 1, 2024, and every LLC formed or registered in any state now reports its beneficial owners to FinCEN regardless of where the charter sits. The Wyoming pitch, which was always half marketing and half real, is now mostly marketing. Meanwhile California's $800 minimum tax continues to follow activity, not address, under Revenue and Taxation Code section 17941.

The question, and the shape of the answer

The question arrives in a predictable form. "I live in [home state] and I've read [Wyoming or Delaware or Nevada] is better for LLCs. Should I form there?" The answer is almost always no, and the cases where it is yes are narrower than the internet suggests.

Three situations genuinely justify forming outside the state where you work. A venture-bound C-corporation headed toward institutional money belongs in Delaware from day one; the investor will insist on it later if you do not. A pure holding company that owns passive assets and transacts nowhere can live in Wyoming or New Mexico cheaply. And a structure that stacks an operating entity under a separate holding entity, for liability isolation or estate planning, gets a legitimate benefit from placing the holdco in a different jurisdiction than the operator.

Everything else, the solo consultancy, the e-commerce side hustle, the rental-property LLC held by one person who lives in the same state as the property, is paying twice for nothing.

Why the operating state always wins

The rule you cannot out-structure is simple. The state where the business actually does business gets to tax and regulate it. Your charter state gets to collect its own fees on top.

California's version, R&TC section 17941, imposes an $800 annual tax on every LLC "doing business in this state" or "registered with the Secretary of State." "Doing business" is defined in R&TC section 23101 as actively engaging in any transaction for the purpose of financial gain, or meeting one of three quantitative thresholds that scale with inflation (for 2024, California sales over roughly $711,538, or property or payroll over roughly $71,154). A single consultant billing clients from a California apartment meets the first prong without ever touching the thresholds. A Wyoming LLC in that posture owes California's $800, files Form 568, and also has to register with the California Secretary of State as a foreign LLC on Form LLC-5 for a $70 fee. The Wyoming side does not go away: Wyoming's annual report license tax under Wyo. Stat. section 17-29-209 is $60 minimum, plus a registered-agent fee that tends to run $50 to $150 a year.

Total for the Wyoming detour: California's $800, plus Wyoming's ~$160, plus two sets of filings. Total if you had formed in California to begin with: California's $800, one filing. The Wyoming route costs roughly $160 a year and forever, and buys nothing unless one of the three narrow reasons applies.

New York works the same way under Tax Law section 658(c)(1) and the publication requirement at BCL section 121-1500. Texas applies its franchise tax to any entity "doing business" in Texas under Tax Code section 171.001 regardless of state of formation. Foreign qualification fees run roughly $50 to $750 per state depending on where you land; the maintenance compounds every year. See foreign qualification vs. re-incorporation for the mechanics of backing out once you have already registered in the wrong place.

The Wyoming privacy pitch, post-CTA

The older version of this article gave Wyoming a genuine point for privacy. As of January 1, 2024, that point is thinner.

The Corporate Transparency Act, 31 U.S.C. section 5336, requires every "reporting company," which includes almost every LLC and corporation formed or registered to do business in the United States, to file a Beneficial Ownership Information report with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. The report names every individual who owns 25% or more or exercises substantial control, with date of birth, address, and a government ID image. Entities formed before January 1, 2024 had until January 1, 2025 to file; entities formed during 2024 have 90 days from formation; entities formed in 2025 and after, 30 days. The BOI database is not public, but it sits with FinCEN and is accessible to federal law enforcement and, on request, to financial institutions performing customer due diligence.

Wyoming and New Mexico still do not print the member's name on the public certificate. That remains a real feature against a casual county-recorder search or a journalist building a cap table from state records. But the federal floor is now set. If someone with a subpoena wants to know who owns a Wyoming LLC, they have a path that did not exist before 2024. The privacy case for Wyoming now lives in the gap between "not on Google" and "discoverable by federal process," which is a narrower strip than it used to be.

The pending challenge is National Small Business United v. Yellen, No. 5:22-cv-01448 (N.D. Ala. Mar. 1, 2024), on appeal to the Eleventh Circuit at No. 24-10736. As of this dateline, the district court has enjoined CTA enforcement against the named plaintiffs only, and FinCEN is continuing to accept BOI filings from everyone else. See our BOI compliance taxonomy for how the beneficial-owner definition actually parses in practice.

When the second state actually earns its keep

Delaware earns its keep for case law if you are building something with an exit or an investor in view. The Court of Chancery publishes written opinions that other courts treat as persuasive, which matters when there is a merger dispute, an appraisal action, or a fiduciary-duty claim. For a two-founder SaaS company that might raise a Series A in three years, starting in Delaware avoids a conversion later that costs several thousand dollars in legal and leaves a visible scar in the cap table. The 2023 amendments to 6 Del. C. section 18-806 on LLC dissolution mechanics and the 2024 SB 313 amendments to the DGCL (clarifying stockholder agreements after West Palm Beach Firefighters v. Moelis) are the kind of adjustments the Delaware chancellors make in real time that other states take years to match.

The holding-company pattern is the other case. If you own three rental properties in three states, the rational structure is one LLC per property in each property's state (because real property almost always triggers foreign qualification and local filing requirements where the property sits), owned by a single parent holding LLC in a low-cost state. Wyoming and New Mexico work here precisely because the parent does not operate anywhere; it holds membership interests. That is not "doing business" under any state's definition and does not trigger foreign qualification. The parent pays Wyoming's $60 or New Mexico's $0, and each subsidiary pays its own state's fees. The parent exists for liability isolation, bankruptcy-remote structuring, and estate planning, not for tax arbitrage on the operating entities.

The third case is the genuinely passive investment vehicle: a family LLC that holds a brokerage account, a piece of intellectual property someone licenses out, or a note portfolio. With no active operations in any state, there is no operating state to double-count, and the cheap-to-maintain jurisdictions do their job.

The rule, stated cleanly

If your business has one person, one laptop, and one state, form in that state. If you have a genuine holdco-under-opco structure, put the holdco somewhere cheap and leave the opco where it operates. If you are raising institutional money, form in Delaware. If you cannot name which of these three you are, you are in the first group.

The "Wyoming is cheaper" pitch travels well because it is true for people who live in Wyoming. It becomes false the minute your operating state enters the picture, and in 2024 your operating state almost certainly has a franchise tax, a "doing business" statute written broadly enough to reach you, and a revenue agency that has integrated 1099 matching with state tax returns. California, New York, Texas, and Illinois between them catch most of the readers who are asking the question. For a version of this analysis with sharper numbers on the two-state mechanics, see our Delaware vs. Wyoming LLC math.

Rule of thumb: form where you sleep and work, unless you can name the statute, case, or structural feature that justifies a second state.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.