Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 9 MIN READ

New York's LLC publication rule, twenty-four years in

A 1994 tradeoff that never left, and the reform bills that keep dying in committee

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
9 min read Updated
Contents 6 sections
  1. What § 206 actually says
  2. The 1994 bargain
  3. What actually happens if you skip it
  4. The reform bills that died
  5. What this means for a formation in the last weeks of 2018
  6. Sources

he New York LLC publication requirement is the most expensive formality in American entity formation. A Manhattan LLC that forms in December 2018 and follows § 206 of the Limited Liability Company Law to the letter will spend more on two newspapers than it spent on the state filing, the registered agent, and the first year of any reasonable operating agreement template combined.

Twenty-four years after the Legislature wrote the rule into the 1994 LLC Act, the publication requirement is still on the books, the county clerks are still designating the newspapers, and the Assembly is still killing reform bills in committee. This is a review of where the rule actually stands at the end of 2018, what it costs, what happens when you ignore it, and why the last two reform efforts went nowhere.

What § 206 actually says

Section 206 of the New York LLC Law is short and, read cold, sounds like a nineteenth-century artifact. Within 120 days after a domestic LLC files its articles of organization, or after a foreign LLC files an application for authority, the entity must cause a copy of the articles (or a notice containing the substance of them) to be published once a week for six successive weeks in two newspapers of the county in which the office of the LLC is located. One newspaper must be a daily; the other must be a weekly. Both newspapers must be designated by the county clerk.

After the six weeks of publication run, each newspaper issues an affidavit of publication. The LLC then files a Certificate of Publication with the Department of State, attaching the two affidavits and paying a $50 filing fee. The statutory text and the filing fee are published on the Department of State's own website.

The designation requirement is the part that does the cost damage. A Manhattan LLC cannot pick the cheapest daily in the state and the cheapest weekly in the state. It must publish in whichever two papers the New York County Clerk has designated. The clerks in the five boroughs have, for years, designated small-circulation legal journals and community weeklies whose advertising rates for a six-week statutory run have no relationship to the number of actual readers who will see the notice. This is not hidden. Any New York formation lawyer will tell a client on the first call that publication in Manhattan runs somewhere between $1,000 and $2,000 all in, and that the number is a function of geography, not choice.

Outside the city the math softens. In the upstate counties, where the designated papers tend to be the actual community daily and the actual community weekly, a six-week run plus the $50 Certificate fee typically lands in the $200 to $600 range. Buffalo, Rochester, Syracuse, Albany, and the counties around them sit at the lower end of that band. Westchester and Nassau sit closer to the city. The result is that the publication cost is one of the largest determinants of where a New York formation lawyer tells a client to put the registered office, which is a strange thing for a disclosure rule to be doing.

The 1994 bargain

The requirement did not arrive in a vacuum. When the Legislature passed the New York LLC Act in 1994 (Chapter 576 of the Laws of 1994), New York was late to the LLC party by roughly seventeen years. Wyoming had authorized LLCs in 1977; by 1994 the entity form was nearly universal. The 1994 Act was drafted against a backdrop in which New York's bar, the business community, and the unions all had to agree to let another limited-liability form exist alongside the close corporation, the professional corporation, and the limited partnership.

The publication requirement was imported from the existing Partnership Law treatment of limited partnerships, which had required newspaper publication for decades. Two things were happening at once. First, the Legislature wanted a public-notice record for a new form that offered the liability shield of a corporation without the capital structure or the formal governance. Second, the community newspaper lobby, which had a protected revenue stream from LP publication, wanted the stream preserved as LLCs came online. Both impulses pulled in the same direction, so the 1994 Act carried the rule over with minor changes.

The public-notice rationale is the one the rule's defenders still raise. The economic rationale is the one that explains why the rule has survived four administrations' worth of reform proposals. Small community newspapers in New York depend on statutory-notice revenue to a degree that would surprise anyone who assumes legal-notice advertising is a trivial category. In the smaller upstate markets, publication fees from LLCs, LPs, and the assorted other statutory notices can be the difference between a profitable year and a loss. This is not a criticism. It is the reason every reform bill in the last decade has failed. For a broader backdrop on how the 1994 Act fits into a New York formation today, see our New York LLC formation guide.

What actually happens if you skip it

The enforcement mechanism, on paper, is severe. Under § 206(a), an LLC that fails to publish within the 120-day window has its authority to maintain an action or special proceeding in New York suspended. The suspension is not a dissolution; the LLC continues to exist, the liability shield continues to operate, and contracts the LLC enters remain valid. What the LLC cannot do is walk into a New York court and sue on those contracts until it cures the publication failure.

In practice, the enforcement has been inconsistent enough that publication compliance is widely treated as a deadline to manage rather than a hard constraint. The Appellate Division cases that have interpreted § 206 over the last decade are a study in how a rule can be formally severe and functionally soft at the same time.

In Barklee Realty Co. v. Pataki, 309 A.D.2d 310 (1st Dep't 2003), the First Department considered and rejected a constitutional challenge to the publication rule on equal-protection and due-process grounds, holding that the Legislature's public-notice rationale supplied a rational basis. The opinion is the foundational cite for the proposition that § 206 is here to stay absent legislative action.

On the suspension side, the case law has been less clean. Several trial-level decisions have treated curing the publication failure as a permissible step at any point before final judgment, effectively letting plaintiffs file first and publish later. Others have enforced the suspension strictly and dismissed actions brought by non-compliant LLCs, leaving those LLCs to refile after curing. Sanford v. Sanford, reported in the New York Law Journal in 2008, is a frequently cited example of the strict-enforcement posture. The inconsistency is enough that New York commercial litigators routinely check a plaintiff LLC's publication status at the beginning of any contested matter, because the answer determines whether the first motion on the defense side is a 3211 motion targeting capacity.

The shield itself is the other place practitioners look for downstream consequences. There is no reported New York decision holding that a publication failure, standing alone, pierces the LLC veil. The theory has been argued in close-LLC disputes and has not found traction; courts have treated § 206 as a notice statute rather than a formation statute, and have declined to let private plaintiffs use it as a tool to get at members' personal assets. Publication failure hurts you when you want to sue. It does not, on current authority, hurt you when someone wants to sue you.

The reform bills that died

Two reform efforts in the current legislative cycle deserve specific mention because they show how the politics have stayed constant even as the numbers have grown.

Assembly Bill A02355, introduced in the 2017-2018 session, would have repealed § 206 outright and substituted a Department of State online notice, posted on the Department's public-filings page at the time the LLC's articles were processed. The bill was referred to the Assembly Corporations, Authorities, and Commissions Committee and did not emerge. No companion Senate bill was introduced. The sponsor's memo cited the cost burden on small businesses and the vanishing readership of legal-notice papers. The bill died in committee.

Assembly Bill A04817, introduced in the 2018 session, took a narrower approach. Rather than repealing the requirement, it would have expanded the definition of a qualifying publication to include any newspaper of general circulation in the county, removing the county-clerk designation monopoly. The effect, if passed, would have been to let an LLC publish in the Daily News and a neighborhood weekly of its choice in Manhattan, rather than in whichever designated paper the clerk had picked. The bill was referred to the same committee and met the same fate. Again, no Senate companion.

The pattern is straightforward. Reform bills come from members representing commercial districts whose constituents pay the publication premium. They get referred to Corporations. The committee chair has historically represented a district where legal-notice revenue matters to local papers. The bill does not move. The next session, a new bill is introduced with a slightly different approach. The next committee chair sits on it. Nothing about this pattern looks likely to change in the 2019 session.

What this means for a formation in the last weeks of 2018

A New York LLC forming in December 2018 has until roughly mid-April 2019 to complete publication, absent an extension. Three practical points follow from the current state of the rule.

The registered-office county determines the bill. An LLC whose members live in Manhattan but whose operations are anywhere else in the state can legally locate its office upstate, which collapses the publication cost from four figures to three. This is a routine move that New York formation lawyers have recommended for years. The tradeoff is that the registered-office address is public, and it needs to be a real address where a natural person or a commercial agent can receive service of process. A commercial registered-agent service in Albany or Buffalo will typically run $100 to $200 a year and save several times that in publication fees in year one alone.

The 120-day clock is worth honoring, but the failure mode is curable. Counsel in New York routinely encounter LLCs that missed publication by a year or more and were never aware of the requirement until a dispute required them to sue. Curing a late publication is mechanically identical to timely publication: run the six weeks, file the Certificate, pay the $50, move on. The suspension lifts on the filing date. What you cannot do is paper over the gap retroactively.

The rule is unlikely to change before a 2019 formation has come and gone. If a client asks whether to wait and see what happens with reform, the honest answer in late 2018 is that two bills have just died in committee, no Senate companion has been introduced for either, and the papers whose revenue stream is at stake have lost none of their access in Albany. The 2019 session will produce a new bill. That bill will probably die too.

If the publication requirement ever goes, it will not go because the Legislature decided the public-notice rationale had worn through. It will go because the designated newspapers stopped being viable businesses and the revenue the rule protects stopped existing. That is a slower process than a committee vote, and it is the one actually underway.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.