Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 9 MIN READ

The nonprofit corporation, a decade into the 501(c)(3) machine

State Articles, federal Form 1023, and the quiet operational tax of running a charity in 2025

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
9 min read Updated
Contents 9 sections
  1. The state filing is not the exemption
  2. Form 1023 and Form 1023-EZ
  3. The 27-month window
  4. Fundraising registration, the quiet tax
  5. Annual compliance after recognition
  6. The CTA, FinCEN, and the 501(c) carve-out
  7. Processing times in 2025
  8. Who the form actually fits
  9. Sources

nonprofit corporation in the United States is two filings stacked on top of each other. One is a state Articles of Incorporation that creates a legal entity; the other is a federal Form 1023 that asks the IRS to recognize the entity as exempt under Internal Revenue Code §501(c)(3). Ten years into the current version of this regime, the cost and the sequencing are stable enough to plan around, and the failure modes are predictable enough to avoid.

This guide is for a founder in August 2025 deciding whether to take the 1023 path or the 1023-EZ path, and what the first two years of maintenance actually cost in time and fees.

The state filing is not the exemption

Incorporating a nonstock, nonprofit corporation under state law gives you an entity. It does not give you tax exemption. The exemption is a separate federal determination that you have to earn by filing a recognition application with the IRS after (or in parallel with) the state filing.

Most states now route nonprofits through a dedicated nonstock corporation statute. Delaware remains a popular framing, for reasons that echo the for-profit case: a mature body of case law, a responsive Division of Corporations, and a judiciary that is comfortable with governance disputes. Delaware's nonstock provisions live in 8 Del. C. Chapter 5 of the General Corporation Law, and the practical mechanics are similar to forming a for-profit corporation, with members or a self-perpetuating board substituting for stockholders.

Wherever you file, the Articles of Incorporation have to carry specific language to support the later federal exemption application. The IRS has been explicit about this since the 1959 regulations and has not softened the position: the organizing document must limit the corporation's purposes to one or more purposes described in §501(c)(3), must not expressly permit activities that do not further those purposes other than as an insubstantial part of its activities, and must contain a dissolution clause dedicating the assets to another §501(c)(3) organization or to a federal, state, or local government for a public purpose. This is the organizational test in Treas. Reg. §1.501(c)(3)-1(b).

Two accompanying clauses are not optional as a practical matter. The first is a private inurement ban, because §501(c)(3) bars net earnings from inuring to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. The second is a limitation on lobbying and a prohibition on political campaign intervention, tracking the statutory text. The IRS publishes sample language for both the purpose clause and the dissolution clause in Publication 557, and a filer who copies that language verbatim removes one class of rejection risk.

If the Articles do not satisfy the organizational test, the IRS will not grant the exemption. Some states will let you amend to cure; amendments cost more than getting it right the first time, and in the interim the 27-month relation-back clock is running.

Form 1023 and Form 1023-EZ

The federal side is one of two forms. Form 1023 is the long-form Application for Recognition of Exemption under §501(c)(3). Form 1023-EZ is the streamlined version introduced in 2014. The choice between them is mostly governed by size.

Under the eligibility worksheet attached to the 1023-EZ instructions, an organization can file the EZ only if it projects annual gross receipts of $50,000 or less in each of the next three years, had $50,000 or less in gross receipts in each of the past three years, and has total assets of $250,000 or less. There are also categorical exclusions: churches, schools, hospitals, supporting organizations, and organizations formed outside the United States cannot use the EZ regardless of size.

The user fees are set by revenue procedure and updated annually. For 2025, Rev. Proc. 2025-5 fixes the Form 1023 user fee at $600 and the Form 1023-EZ user fee at $275. Those fees are paid through Pay.gov at the time of filing and are nonrefundable whether or not the IRS grants recognition.

The 1023-EZ is attractive because it is short, inexpensive, and in most cases resolved in weeks rather than months. It is also the form most likely to generate a later problem. The EZ asks for attestations rather than documents; it does not require the applicant to submit its Articles, bylaws, or a narrative of activities. TIGTA and the National Taxpayer Advocate have both criticized the EZ for producing approvals that would not have survived long-form review. If there is anything complicated about your activities (fiscal sponsorship, commercial co-ventures, foreign grantmaking, unrelated business income, compensated insiders), file the long 1023 even if you qualify for the EZ. The extra $325 buys a more defensible file.

The 27-month window

The single most important date in nonprofit formation is not on the state calendar. It is the date the Articles are filed. From that day the applicant has 27 months to file Form 1023 and have the exemption relate back to the date of formation.

The rule is in IRC §508(a) and Treas. Reg. §1.508-1(a)(2). File within 27 months from the end of the month in which the organization was formed, and recognition, if granted, is effective as of the formation date. Miss the 27-month window and recognition generally runs from the postmark date of the application, not from formation. Any donations received in the gap period lose their deductibility as charitable contributions to a §501(c)(3), and any income the organization earned in that window may be taxable.

There is a Rev. Proc. 2014-11 path to retroactive reinstatement for organizations whose exempt status was automatically revoked for three consecutive years of nonfiling. That is a different problem from the original 27-month problem, and it is not a substitute. The practical rule is the one to internalize: from the day you file Articles, you have a little more than two years to finish the 1023, and a prudent founder treats the window as eighteen months.

Fundraising registration, the quiet tax

A recognition letter from the IRS does not authorize the organization to solicit contributions. Forty-one states plus the District of Columbia require charitable solicitation registration before the organization asks the public for money. The registration regime is fragmented; each state runs its own form, its own fee schedule, and its own filing cadence. The Unified Registration Statement, a joint project of the National Association of State Charity Officials and the National Association of Attorneys General, is accepted in some states and not others, and even where accepted usually requires state-specific supplements.

For a national-reach nonprofit, multi-state registration is a real operational cost. Annual renewal fees across the full footprint can run into the low thousands, before anyone bills for preparation. The penalty for skipping this step is not theoretical: New York, California, and a handful of other AG offices will issue cease-and-desist letters to unregistered solicitors, and some state-level online donation platforms will decline to process contributions for an organization that cannot produce a current registration.

If the organization's fundraising is genuinely local (one state, maybe two), the compliance burden is manageable. If the fundraising plan involves a website that accepts donations from anywhere, build a registration calendar on day one.

Annual compliance after recognition

Maintenance at the federal level is Form 990 in one of three sizes, keyed to gross receipts under IRC §6033. Organizations with gross receipts normally under $50,000 file the Form 990-N e-Postcard, a short electronic filing with effectively no preparation cost. Organizations with gross receipts under $200,000 and total assets under $500,000 may file the Form 990-EZ. Everyone else files the full Form 990. Private foundations file the Form 990-PF regardless of size.

The consequence of missing three consecutive annual filings is automatic revocation of exempt status under §6033(j). The IRS publishes the revocation list, and reinstatement requires a new application and fee. This is the most common failure mode for small nonprofits after the first flush of activity wears off: a board that never quite gets around to the e-Postcard, three years running, and one day discovers the letter has been pulled.

State-level maintenance varies. Delaware requires an annual report and an annual tax; the nonstock corporation annual report fee is $25, and exempt corporations pay a reduced franchise tax. Other states run similar regimes at different price points, and most also require renewal of the charitable solicitation registration on an annual or biennial cadence.

The CTA, FinCEN, and the 501(c) carve-out

The Corporate Transparency Act, passed in 2021 and codified at 31 U.S.C. §5336, required beneficial-ownership reporting to FinCEN from most entities formed in the United States. Congress wrote a long list of exemptions into §5336(a)(11)(B), and the exemption at §5336(a)(11)(B)(xix) covers tax-exempt entities described in §501(c). A properly recognized §501(c)(3) does not have to file a beneficial ownership information report.

FinCEN issued an interim final rule in March 2025 narrowing the reporting regime further, so that ongoing BOI obligations fall only on foreign reporting companies registered to do business in the United States. For domestic nonprofits the practical upshot is the same as it was before: no BOI filing required. A nonprofit corporation that formed but has not yet received its 501(c)(3) determination sits in an awkward place on paper; in practice, FinCEN has not pursued pre-recognition nonprofits, and most practitioners document the exemption in the corporate file and move on.

Processing times in 2025

The IRS 1023 backlog is the operational variable that has moved most over the last ten years. In 2025 the queue for standard Form 1023 applications is running about three to five months from filing to determination, depending on specialist assignment and the volume of follow-up questions. The 1023-EZ continues to resolve in two to four weeks for clean files.

For a founder trying to launch a program in the fall, that lag is real. Applicants can operate during the pendency of the application and can accept contributions conditional on eventual recognition, but many donors, most foundations, and nearly all donor-advised funds will not release a grant until the determination letter arrives. If your first-year budget depends on foundation money, file the 1023 before you hire.

Who the form actually fits

The nonprofit corporation plus §501(c)(3) stack is the right structure for a mission that wants broad-based donor support, access to foundation grants, property-tax exemptions at the state level, and a governance model that is not driven by residual ownership. It is a real commitment, with a three-document organizing file, a federal application, a fundraising-registration calendar, and a 990 every year for as long as the organization exists.

It is the wrong structure for a founder who wants to run a mission-driven business with retained upside. A fiscal sponsorship arrangement with an existing §501(c)(3) is a faster and cheaper way to test whether there is a charitable program worth building, and it leaves the question of standing up a standalone entity for the moment when the work has enough traction to justify the overhead. A public benefit corporation, a for-profit chartered under a state PBC statute, is a different answer to a related question and does not produce deductible contributions.

The decision that founders most often get wrong is timing. The state filing is cheap and fast, and the federal filing is neither. Treat the Articles as the day the clock starts and the 1023 as the real project, and the first year of a nonprofit is a manageable exercise rather than a scramble against a 27-month deadline nobody warned you about.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.