Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 8 MIN READ

The PLLC, reappraised: what licensed trades actually get for the extra word

A 2023 look at when a Professional LLC earns its keep, and when it is a state-mandated formality with tax consequences

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
8 min read Updated
Contents 6 sections
  1. Where the PLLC is mandatory and where it is not
  2. What the PLLC does and does not shield
  3. Federal tax treatment is a non-event
  4. The Corporate Transparency Act changes the maintenance picture
  5. When the PLLC earns the extra paperwork
  6. Sources

Professional LLC is a plain LLC with a state board looking over its shoulder. The tax treatment is identical, the liability shield against third-party torts is identical, and in 2023 the filing costs are roughly identical. What changes is who is allowed to own the thing, what the firm name is allowed to say, and whether the state will let you form at all.

For most licensed trades, the PLLC is a compliance requirement, not a tax strategy. The interesting question is what it does not do, because that is where founders get hurt.

Where the PLLC is mandatory and where it is not

The map is less uniform than the name suggests. Three reference states show the range.

California does not have a PLLC. Corporations Code §§ 13400 through 13410, the Moscone-Knox Professional Corporation Act, requires California licensed professionals (physicians, lawyers, accountants, architects, and the rest of the enumerated list) to practice through a Professional Corporation. A California CPA or attorney who wants a limited liability vehicle forms a PC, not a PLLC. The Secretary of State will not let a licensed professional form an LLC for the regulated practice at all; Corporations Code § 17701.04(e) is the fence on the general LLC statute.

New York requires a PLLC for any "profession" on its learned-profession list, defined by LLC Law § 1203 and Education Law § 6509. Members must be licensed in the profession the PLLC practices. The Secretary of State forwards the filing to the Department of Education for approval before issuing the receipt, which adds time and a second fee. Out-of- state owners are allowed only if they are licensed in the same profession under New York law.

Texas uses Business Organizations Code chapter 304 to govern professional entities. Accountants, architects, engineers, and most other licensed trades may form a PLLC. Attorneys cannot; under BOC §§ 301.003 and 304.001, Texas attorneys must practice through a Professional Corporation, a Professional Association, or a Professional LLP, and the State Bar's disciplinary rules will not register a PLLC for a law firm.

Florida is the easy case. Chapter 621 of the Florida Statutes allows a PLLC for any service "rendered by persons duly licensed," but a general LLC can also provide most professional services so long as each licensee carries personal responsibility for their own practice. Founders often choose the plain LLC because the filing page is simpler and Florida does not require board pre-clearance.

The practical rule: before you file, pull your state's professional entity statute and your licensing board's rules. Both have to agree. State formation law decides what the Secretary of State will accept; board rules decide whether the resulting entity can actually be licensed to practice. A dentist who forms a plain LLC in a PLLC state has a registered entity that cannot legally see patients.

What the PLLC does and does not shield

The shield against third-party business liabilities looks like a plain LLC's. If your receptionist slips on the lobby floor, if a vendor sues for non-payment, if a data breach generates a class action, the PLLC stands between the plaintiff and the members' personal assets the same way any LLC does.

The shield does not reach malpractice by the member personally. Every state that authorizes a PLLC keeps the treating or advising professional individually liable for their own negligence. The PLLC can limit the non-negligent members' exposure to partnership-style joint liability, which is the whole reason the form exists, but the professional who mis-diagnosed, mis-filed, or mis-built stays on the hook. This is not a bug. It is the deal the licensing boards extracted in exchange for letting limited-liability entities into the regulated trades at all.

Every state that allows a PLLC also requires malpractice insurance or a posted bond, and the board minimums vary. New York's regulations for design professionals set a floor in the low six figures per claim; Texas accountancy board rules require coverage in line with the firm's practice size. Fetch the board's rule for your specific trade; the numbers move.

Federal tax treatment is a non-event

For federal tax purposes the IRS does not care that the LLC has a P in front of it. Treasury Regulation § 301.7701-3 (the check-the-box rule) treats a PLLC the same way it treats any LLC: default disregarded for a single member, default partnership for two or more, and available for an S-corp or C-corp election via Form 8832 or Form 2553. The state label has no federal consequence.

Where the tax trap lives is Section 199A. The qualified business income deduction is available to pass-throughs, including PLLCs, but health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage, and investing are all "specified service trades or businesses" under § 199A(d)(2) and Treas. Reg. § 1.199A-5. For an SSTB, the deduction phases out between $170,050 and $220,050 of taxable income for single filers and between $340,100 and $440,100 for joint filers in 2022 tax returns (the thresholds indexed under Rev. Proc. 2021-45); for 2023 returns, Rev. Proc. 2022-38 raises the single threshold to $182,100 and the joint threshold to $364,200. Above the top of the phase-out, an SSTB professional gets no 199A deduction at all.

Which is the brutal part for anyone running a solo PLLC above the threshold. A plumber's LLC at the same income level keeps the deduction in full. The dentist next door gets nothing. The statute draws the line at who the founder is, not how the entity is structured.

Treasury's anti-abuse rule at § 1.199A-5(c)(2), the so-called "crack and pack" rule, closes the obvious workaround. If a dentist spins the x-ray equipment into a separate LLC and leases it back to the practice, both entities are treated as the same SSTB for 199A purposes when the spinoff has more than 50 percent common ownership and 80 percent or more of its revenue comes from the SSTB. A clean shell company whose only customer is the doctor's PLLC will not generate a deduction the practice itself could not generate.

The advice column at a PLLC formation is short: pick the form because your licensing board requires it, not because you expect a tax edge. The tax edge is mostly on the other side of the 199A fence.

The Corporate Transparency Act changes the maintenance picture

The Corporate Transparency Act at 31 U.S.C. § 5336 applies to a PLLC the same way it applies to any entity formed by filing a document with a state office. FinCEN published its final beneficial-ownership reporting rule at 87 Fed. Reg. 59498, which sets the effective date at January 1, 2024. From that date forward, a newly formed PLLC has 30 days to file an initial beneficial-ownership information report naming every individual who owns 25 percent or more or who exercises substantial control. An existing PLLC formed before January 1, 2024 has until January 1, 2025 to file.

The 23 exemptions in the rule are narrow. The large-operating-company carve-out requires more than 20 U.S. employees, a physical office in the United States, and more than $5 million in prior-year gross receipts reported on a federal return. The exemption for public accounting firms registered under Sarbanes-Oxley § 102 covers a specific category of PCAOB-registrants, which is not most accountants. The practical expectation for PLLCs of the size most licensed professionals run: you file.

Filing is not public. The BOI report goes to FinCEN's BOSS database, which is available to law enforcement and to financial institutions with customer consent. The penalty for willful non-filing is $500 per day up to $10,000 plus potential criminal exposure, which is aggressive enough that calendaring the deadline is now part of PLLC maintenance alongside the state annual report.

When the PLLC earns the extra paperwork

For a solo licensed professional in a PLLC-mandatory state, there is no choice: the form is the price of admission. The question is only whether to elect S-corp treatment on top of it for payroll-tax savings, which is a separate decision that turns on net income and reasonable compensation.

For a multi-member firm, the PLLC earns its keep. It lets the rainmaker partner and the newly admitted partner share equity without the rainmaker becoming personally liable for the junior's malpractice. A general partnership between licensed professionals hands that liability around by default; a PLLC keeps it contained to the member who committed the act. That is the whole point.

For firms in states like California that do not authorize the PLLC at all, the closest analog is the Professional Corporation with an S-corp election and strict compliance with the state's professional-entity rules on ownership, name, and reporting. The mechanics differ; the liability result is roughly comparable.

And for founders who assumed the P meant a tax benefit, the useful thing the PLLC provides in 2023 is clarity about what it does not do. It does not lower the federal tax bill. It does not insulate the practitioner from their own malpractice. It does not exempt them from the new FinCEN filing regime. What it does is let a licensed professional use a limited-liability shell in states that would otherwise force them into a general partnership or a professional corporation, and for most of them, that is enough.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.