Incorporator The Journal of U.S. Formation
Start Free Quiz
Editorial 7 MIN READ

The public benefit corporation, four years after HB 341

Delaware's PBC is no longer a curiosity; it is a live option for companies that want purpose settled in the charter

The Editors
Staff, Incorporator.org
7 min read Updated
Contents 7 sections
  1. What the statute actually requires
  2. What HB 341 actually changed
  3. PBC is not B Corp
  4. What the form is actually good for
  5. The federal overlay
  6. What the form will not do
  7. Sources

he Delaware public benefit corporation is a for-profit corporation that states a specific public benefit in its charter and directs its board to balance that benefit against stockholder returns. It is not a charity, it is not a B Corp certification, and it is not a novelty any longer.

Since Delaware lowered the vote needed to convert an existing corporation into a PBC from ninety percent to two-thirds in July 2020, the entity has moved from the margins into the S-1s of venture-backed companies that want purpose settled before they price. Four years on, it is worth walking through what the statute actually does.

What the statute actually requires

The PBC is codified at 8 Del. C. §§361-368, subchapter XV of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Three provisions carry most of the weight.

Section 362 defines a public benefit corporation as a for-profit Delaware corporation "intended to produce a public benefit or public benefits and to operate in a responsible and sustainable manner." The charter must identify one or more specific public benefits; a charter that says only "operate sustainably" does not meet the requirement.

Section 365 is the tripartite balancing rule. Directors of a PBC must manage the business "in a manner that balances the pecuniary interests of the stockholders, the best interests of those materially affected by the corporation's conduct, and the specific public benefit or public benefits identified in its certificate of incorporation." That is a material departure from ordinary Delaware fiduciary duty, which runs to stockholders and to the corporate enterprise. Under §365(b), a director who makes an informed and disinterested decision weighing those three considerations is deemed to satisfy their fiduciary duties.

Section 366 is the reporting obligation. Every PBC must deliver to its stockholders, at least biennially, a statement covering the objectives the board set to promote the public benefit, the standards it adopted to measure progress, objective factual information on that progress, and an assessment of success. The statute leaves the standards to the board, does not require third-party certification, and does not require the report be made public (though many PBCs publish it).

Nothing in §§361-368 changes the rules on capitalization, taxation, indemnification, or appraisal. A PBC is taxed as a C-corporation unless it elects S status, and its directors have the same §102(b)(7) exculpation option available to any other Delaware board. The statute grafts a purpose and a balancing rule onto the chassis; the chassis itself is unchanged.

What HB 341 actually changed

Delaware HB 341, signed July 16, 2020, rewrote the conversion mechanics. Before HB 341, §363 required a ninety percent supermajority of each class of outstanding stock to convert an existing Delaware corporation into a PBC, and gave dissenters appraisal rights. Ninety percent is close to impossible on a cap table with institutional preferred and a meaningful common float; the effect was that most companies wanting PBC status formed fresh or redomesticated rather than converted.

HB 341 lowered the threshold to two-thirds of the outstanding stock of each class entitled to vote and eliminated the appraisal trigger tied to the conversion. A conversion is now a supermajority vote a well-advised company with a cooperative investor base can complete.

The change coincided with, and probably accelerated, a run of PBC IPOs. Lemonade priced as a PBC on July 2, 2020, two weeks before HB 341 was signed. Vital Farms went public as a PBC on August 5, 2020. Veeva Systems, already public, converted to PBC status in February 2021 after a stockholder vote conducted under the new two-thirds rule. Allbirds priced as a PBC in November 2021. Each S-1 carried a variant of the same risk factor: the company is not required to maximize stockholder value, and the board is statutorily empowered to weigh stated mission and stakeholder interests.

The most discussed use of the form in this period was not an IPO. In September 2022, Yvon Chouinard transferred the voting stock of Patagonia to the Patagonia Purpose Trust and the non-voting economic stock to the Holdfast Collective, a 501(c)(4) that now receives Patagonia's distributable profits. The 2022 restructuring used PBC status as the legal substrate that let mission run through to a purpose trust and a social-welfare organization without tripping the stockholder-primacy wire a conventional C-corp structure would have pulled.

PBC is not B Corp

The two are routinely conflated and should not be. B Corp is a private certification administered by B Lab, a Pennsylvania nonprofit, based on a scored assessment of social and environmental practices. Certification can go to LLCs, S-corps, C-corps, and foreign entities; it is a brand and an audit, not a legal status.

Public benefit corporation is a Delaware corporate form authorized by §§361-368 of the DGCL. It is a legal status that changes directors' fiduciary framework and imposes a statutory reporting obligation. A company can be a PBC and not a B Corp, a B Corp and not a PBC, both, or neither. B Lab does require that multi-state US corporations seeking certification adopt a legal form with a stakeholder-governance provision, which in Delaware means PBC, but that is B Lab's contractual condition on its mark, not a rule of Delaware law.

What the form is actually good for

The PBC suits three kinds of companies in 2024. The first is a consumer brand whose mission is load-bearing in its pricing. Patagonia, Allbirds, and Vital Farms each charge a premium tied to stated commitments; PBC status converts that commitment from marketing into charter language, and gives the board cover to decline a trade that would erode the premium.

The second is an insurance or financial-services issuer building a multi-decade book whose durability depends on trust. Lemonade's use of the form fits here; the PBC designation, paired with its Giveback program, signals that the combined-ratio incentive and the policyholder interest are not going to diverge on any given Tuesday.

The third is a founder-succession or mission-lock restructuring where the point is to prevent a future board from reading mission out of the business. Patagonia is the headline example, but the pattern applies to family-held operating companies and founder-led public companies facing generational transition.

PBC status is a poor fit for a pure holding company, for an SPV in a securitization, and for most early-stage companies whose mission has not yet been tested by a real trade-off. The form adds governance friction in exchange for purpose-lock; where there is no purpose to lock, the friction is pure cost.

The federal overlay

One compliance item runs alongside PBC formation and is worth flagging. The Corporate Transparency Act, codified at 31 USC §5336 and implemented by FinCEN regulations that took effect January 1, 2024, requires most newly formed corporations, LLCs, and similar entities, including PBCs, to file a Beneficial Ownership Information report with FinCEN. For an entity formed in 2024, the BOI report is due within 90 days of formation; for entities formed before January 1, 2024, the deadline is January 1, 2025.

The PBC wrapper does not change CTA obligations, and the ordinary exemptions (large operating companies with more than twenty US employees and more than $5 million in US gross receipts, regulated entities, and subsidiaries of exempt entities) apply on the same terms. A founder setting up a new PBC should assume a BOI filing is on the timeline alongside the Certificate of Incorporation.

What the form will not do

PBC status does not immunize directors from litigation. A §365 decision that is uninformed or tainted by self-dealing is no more protected than the same decision in a conventional corporation, and the balancing duty is itself justiciable under §367, which permits derivative suits by stockholders owning at least two percent of outstanding shares or shares worth $2 million.

PBC status also confers no tax benefit. It creates no charitable deduction, exempts no income, and makes no contribution deductible for donors. A PBC pays C-corp tax unless it elects S status on ordinary eligibility terms.

If you are forming a Delaware corporation in 2024 and the mission is central enough to your pricing, your capital base, or your succession plan that you want it in the charter, the PBC is now the default way to put it there. If it is not that central, the traditional DGCL corporation gives your board more latitude and your counsel fewer novel questions. Four years after HB 341, that is the choice, stated cleanly.

Sources

Keep reading

More from the journal.